I really wish I hadn't watched "Superman II" last weekend. To my dismay, it turned out to be another one of the movies that seemed a lot better as a kid.
I remember loving Superman II although that's apparently because I blocked out everything, but the awesome last 30 minutes, which is full of people getting thrown into Coke signs and Marlboro cigarette trucks.
The previous hour is boring and slow so that's why I probably forgot about it.
Superman does almost nothing except for stop some French terrorists at the Eiffel Tower in the beginning. Then he strips himself of his powers for Lois Lane so he can't be Superman anymore.
It's essentially a romantic comedy disguised as Superman for that first hour. The movie's alternate title could be "Sleepless in Metropolis."
Of course, Lois doesn't try to stop Superman from giving up his powers or think about the millions of people who might die as a result if he does. She's perfectly content to let him do it.
Then she makes him stop at diner where a powerless Clark Kent gets his ass kicked.
So as someone pointed out to me, the main message of the movie might be that women can ruin anything, even Superman.
But there's also other deficiencies in the movie that I never noticed until now.
1. Superman has random powers he's never used before.
For instance, he's able to project multiple images of himself and give Lois a memory erasing kiss. When the hell did he get these powers?
It's not like he needs these extra powers anyway. But by far the worst power is the saran wrap "S" he pulls from his chest and throws at a bad guy.
It makes no sense at all. I don't want to see Superman fight with something I use to keep my leftovers fresh for the next day.
2. The Fortress of Solitude doesn't live up to its name
Everybody and their mother finds it and visits. Is it really that easy to find?
Lex Luther gets to it in a hot air balloon, a powerless Superman walks back there in a Members Only jacket, and Luther knows its location so well that he goes back there a second time with General Zod.
3. Lois and Clark are bad journalists
I know it's a minor thing, but they're not even trying to make it look realistic. They get assigned a story in Niagara Falls by their editor Perry White, don't do it and never check back in with him.
And even though they're journalists, they don't read a paper or watch TV for like a week so they have no idea about General Zod and his minions wreaking havoc on Earth. What kind of journalists do that?
It's because of lazy people like them that the journalism industry is struggling today.
If only real life was more like "Superman II" then Superman could randomly erase my memory of the boring first 60 minutes of the movie and just have me only remember the action-packed 30 minutes again.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar